{"id":1419,"date":"2022-05-20T09:35:57","date_gmt":"2022-05-20T07:35:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chessily.com\/?p=1419"},"modified":"2022-06-06T17:27:25","modified_gmt":"2022-06-06T15:27:25","slug":"is-a-queen-better-than-a-rook-and-bishop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chessily.com\/questions\/is-a-queen-better-than-a-rook-and-bishop\/","title":{"rendered":"Is a Queen Better Than a Rook and Bishop?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Is a Queen Better Than a Rook and Bishop?<\/h1>\n

Assessing and comparing the value of multiple chess pieces can be a tricky undertaking. So it comes to no surprise that beginners<\/a> often ask, whether the queen<\/a> is better than a rook and bishop combined. In this article we’ll try to answer that question in an easy-to-understand manner. Let’s go!<\/p>\n

Queen vs. Rook and Bishop \u2013 Their Value<\/h1>\n

In chess, we traditionally value each piece by the amount of pawns<\/a> it is worth. In other words, we ask ourselves: “How many pawns do I need to offset the loss of a certain piece?”. These values are well-known and studied, and look something like this for the three pieces we are interested in:<\/p>\n