{"id":1419,"date":"2022-05-20T09:35:57","date_gmt":"2022-05-20T07:35:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chessily.com\/?p=1419"},"modified":"2022-06-06T17:27:25","modified_gmt":"2022-06-06T15:27:25","slug":"is-a-queen-better-than-a-rook-and-bishop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chessily.com\/questions\/is-a-queen-better-than-a-rook-and-bishop\/","title":{"rendered":"Is a Queen Better Than a Rook and Bishop?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Assessing and comparing the value of multiple chess pieces can be a tricky undertaking. So it comes to no surprise that beginners<\/a> often ask, whether the queen<\/a> is better than a rook and bishop combined. In this article we’ll try to answer that question in an easy-to-understand manner. Let’s go!<\/p>\n In chess, we traditionally value each piece by the amount of pawns<\/a> it is worth. In other words, we ask ourselves: “How many pawns do I need to offset the loss of a certain piece?”. These values are well-known and studied, and look something like this for the three pieces we are interested in:<\/p>\n So, when looking strictly at the value of each piece defined by conventional wisdom, we’d have to conclude that the Queen is better than rook and bishop together, since: 9 > 5+3.<\/p>\n However, the answer is not that straight forward. The value of each piece changes drastically<\/strong> with the position of the game and, especially, the way the piece is being used at that time. For instance, a very well-placed bishop might be worth as much as rook in certain positions. On the other hand, a misplaced queen can be of very little use in the game, lowering her relative value. So, when judging a piece’s worth, we always have to look at what it can do in a certain position, rather than relying on material value.<\/p>\n With the complexity of the question made clear, we can take a closer look at when (and why) exactly the queen is better than the rook and bishop combined.<\/p>\n It is well-known that the queen essentially combines to movement-patterns of the rook and bishop together: She can move any number of unoccupied squares in any horizontal, vertical or diagonal direction. So, why should the queen be worth more than bishop and rook together?<\/p>\n While the rook and bishop can also cover the same amount of squares by combining their movements, the queen has the advantage of only requiring a single move for repositioning. In turn, the queen is much more mobile and can quickly change positions to attack or defend pieces. That gives her a unique advantage compared to the rook and bishop, which is especially strong in more open positions.<\/p>\n Additionally, having two pieces always requires delicate coordination of both pieces, which is not an easy thing to master. When dealing with the rook and bishop, you want them to attack together and defend each other.\u00a0 Have a look at this position:<\/p>\nQueen vs. Rook and Bishop \u2013 Their Value<\/h1>\n
\n
The Queen is More Mobile and Easier to Play<\/h1>\n